Real-Time Web Architecture: Long Polling vs WebSockets vs SSE Explained

The early web was a quiet place. It was built on a simple, passive premise: a client requests a resource, and the server provides it. This 'Request-Response' cycle served the static document web perfectly. However, the modern web is a different beast entirely. From stock tickers and live sports scores to collaborative coding environments and chat applications, users now expect the web to feel alive, instant, and reactive.

The fundamental problem with the traditional HTTP model is that it is stateless and passive. By default, a server cannot initiate communication with a client. It’s like a walkie-talkie where only one person has the button; if the server has urgent news, it has to wait for the client to ask for it.

To solve this, developers have evolved several techniques to simulate or achieve real-time data flow. Today, we aren't just hacking HTTP; we have dedicated protocols. In this article, we will analyze the three main contenders in real-time architecture: Long Polling (the legacy hack), WebSockets (the bi-directional powerhouse), and Server-Sent Events (the underappreciated specialist).

Long Polling: The 'Hacky' Legacy Approach

How it Works

Before HTML5 standards introduced dedicated real-time protocols, developers had to be creative. The result was Long Polling (often associated with 'Comet' programming). While it looks like standard HTTP, the behavior is manipulated to simulate a push.

In a standard HTTP request, the server sends a response immediately and closes the connection. In Long Polling, the client sends a request, and the server holds the connection open intentionally. It does not respond until it actually has data to send (or a timeout occurs). Once the data is available, the server responds, the connection closes, and the client immediately sends a new request to repeat the process.

// Simplified Logic for Long Polling
async function subscribe() {
  try {
    // The server holds this request until data is available
    let response = await fetch("/api/poll");
    let message = await response.text();
    console.log("Received:", message);
    
    // Immediately reconnect
    await subscribe();
  } catch (e) {
    // Handle errors and retry after delay
    setTimeout(subscribe, 1000);
  }
}
subscribe();

Pros and Cons

The primary advantage of Long Polling is universal compatibility. Because it runs on standard XHR or Fetch over standard HTTP, it is practically immune to firewall issues and works on the oldest of legacy browsers. It is also inherently robust; if a connection drops, the client’s logic dictates it should just request again.

However, the trade-offs are significant for modern high-load apps. Long Polling introduces latency; the 'handshake dance' required to re-establish a connection after every message creates a delay. Furthermore, there is significant header overhead. Every time the client re-polls, it must send HTTP headers, cookies, and authentication tokens, which consumes unnecessary bandwidth compared to a persistent connection.

WebSockets: True Full Duplex Communication

The Protocol Upgrade

WebSockets (WS) represented a paradigm shift. Unlike Long Polling, which simulates a persistent connection, WebSockets create an actual TCP-based, two-way channel. The process begins with a standard HTTP request, but includes a special header: Connection: Upgrade and Upgrade: websocket.

If the server accepts this, the protocol switches from HTTP to WebSocket. The connection remains open, allowing for Full Duplex communication. This means the client and server can talk to each other simultaneously and independently, without the overhead of HTTP headers for every message.

// Client-side WebSocket example
const socket = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:8080');

// Connection opened
socket.addEventListener('open', (event) => {
    socket.send('Hello Server!');
});

// Listen for messages
socket.addEventListener('message', (event) => {
    console.log('Message from server ', event.data);
});

When to Use WebSockets

WebSockets are the gold standard for low-latency, high-frequency applications. If your application requires the client to send data as often as it receives it—think multiplayer games, real-time chat apps, or collaborative editing tools like Google Docs—WebSockets are the correct choice. Additionally, unlike the other options, WebSockets support binary data natively, making them ideal for streaming audio or video data.

Trade-offs

With great power comes great complexity. WebSockets require a stateful server architecture. The server must keep a connection open for every active user, which can quickly drain memory and file descriptors on a single server instance, necessitating complex load balancing strategies. Furthermore, the raw WebSocket API doesn't handle reconnection logic or message acknowledgment automatically; you often need heavy libraries (like Socket.io) to handle network instability. Finally, aggressive corporate firewalls occasionally block non-standard traffic on port 80/443 that doesn't behave like HTTP.

Server-Sent Events (SSE): The Simplex Specialist

Unidirectional Data Flow

Server-Sent Events (SSE) occupy a middle ground that is often overlooked. While WebSockets are like a telephone call (two-way), SSE is like a radio station: the tower transmits, and your device listens. This is known as Simplex communication.

SSE works over standard HTTP. The server sets the Content-Type to text/event-stream and leaves the connection open, pushing text-based data blocks whenever necessary.

Developer Experience & Features

The Developer Experience (DX) for SSE is superior to WebSockets for many use cases. It uses the EventSource API, which is built into the browser. Crucially, it includes automatic reconnection logic out of the box. If the connection drops, the browser automatically attempts to reconnect. It also supports 'Event IDs', allowing the server to send the client a 'Last-Event-ID' so the client can catch up on missed messages after a disconnect.

// Native Browser API for SSE
const evtSource = new EventSource("/api/stream");

evtSource.onmessage = (event) => {
  const data = JSON.parse(event.data);
  console.log("New update:", data);
};

evtSource.onerror = (err) => {
  console.error("EventSource failed:", err);
  // The browser will try to reconnect automatically
};

Limitations

The biggest limitation is in the name: Server-Sent. This is strictly unidirectional. If the client needs to send data back, it must use a separate standard fetch request. Additionally, SSE suffers from HTTP/1.1 connection limits. Most browsers limit the number of simultaneous connections to a single domain (usually 6). Opening multiple tabs of an SSE app can block other requests to your site. Finally, SSE is text-only (UTF-8); sending binary data requires Base64 encoding, which adds overhead.

Decision Matrix: Which One Should You Choose?

Choosing the right architecture is not about picking the 'newest' technology, but the one that fits the data flow.

Scenario A: Chat App or Multiplayer Game

Winner: WebSockets. You need sub-millisecond latency and the client talks as much as the server. The overhead of a full TCP duplex connection is justified here.

Scenario B: Stock Ticker, News Feed, or System Status

Winner: SSE. The data flows one way (updates to the user). You don't need the complexity of WebSockets. The built-in reconnection logic of SSE makes it robust for mobile devices where connections flake out often.

Scenario C: Legacy Corporate Network

Winner: Long Polling. If you are deploying to an environment with strict proxies that block WebSocket upgrades or keep-alive connections, Long Polling is your fallback. It isn't pretty, but it always works.

Conclusion

We have moved far beyond the static pages of the early internet. Whether you choose the legacy stability of Long Polling, the raw speed of WebSockets, or the elegant utility of Server-Sent Events, the goal remains the same: reducing the gap between an event happening on the server and the user seeing it on their screen.

My final piece of advice? Don't over-engineer. It is tempting to default to WebSockets for everything, but if you are simply updating a notification badge or a news feed, SSE is lighter on the server and easier to implement. Assess your specific data flow requirements—specifically the direction and frequency of data—before locking yourself into a stack.

Building secure, privacy-first tools means staying ahead of security threats. At ToolShelf, we process data locally in your browser—your data never leaves your device, providing security through isolation.

Check out our developer utilities like the JSON Formatter or Hash Generator—completely offline and private.

Stay secure & happy coding,
— ToolShelf Team